First Gear: Balancing Concentration (samatha) and Insight (vipassana).
My first spiritual opening came in 1982, when I was 23 years old. It was a glimpse of what I now call "the Witness" otherwise known as 2nd Gear in the 3-Speed Transmission. This first, powerful awakening to the fact that there was a deeper reality than my habitual way of seeing the world completely changed my life; having had a taste of this deeper reality, all I wanted to do was "get it back." I began reading everything I could find about meditation, enlightenment, and spirituality, hoping to find a way back "home." All of the authors I was reading said that one should meditate, so I did. But the models of enlightenment I learned about in the books did not satisfy me. It seemed that there was some nebulous, airy-fairy kind of wisdom that Zen masters had, but that couldn't be explained. If you did Zen meditation, maybe it would happen to you too, but there was no guarantee, and in fact the odds were against it.
So, when I met a Theravada Buddhist teacher named Bill Hamilton in 1990 and learned about another way of modeling enlightenment, I was immediately hooked. According to Theravada Buddhism, enlightenment is a clearly mappable, linear process that is reproducible from one practitioner to the next. "Insights" arise in an invariable order, and it is possible to place yourself on a map of attainment and see where you have been and where you are going. This was just what my rational mind wanted to hear! Having grown up in a culture that sees everything as having a beginning, a middle, and an end, I could easily wrap my mind around this map of progressive development and get to work. My new teacher was honest with me about where he believed himself to be on the map and spoke of the meditation techniques and the fruits of the practice in such clear terms that I had no doubt I would be able to succeed within this system.
Theravada Buddhism describes four Paths of Enlightenment, each of which builds upon one before it. When I met Bill Hamilton in 1990, he let it be known through broad hints that he considered himself to have attained 2nd Path and was working toward 3rd. The more I practiced the vipassana (insight meditation), the more my faith in this system was verified. The insights into suffering, impermanence, and no-self came fast and furious, just as my teacher and the old texts said they would. The main point I want to make here about vipassana meditation is that it performs as advertised and a diligent yogi truly can progress through a series of stages that were already clearly described and mapped over 2,000 years ago. This is an exciting and dynamic process that brings benefits much too numerous to describe here.
Each of the four Paths of Enlightenment unfolds through a series of sub-stages, called the Progress of Insight. Once you have completed all 16 stages of the first Progress of Insight, you have, by definition, attained to the First Path of Enlightenment, at which time your understanding of your relationship to yourself and your experience is permanently altered in subtle but profound ways. This new understanding further deepens during the 2nd Progress of Insight, which looks and feels similar to the 1st and culminates in 2nd Path. After this, the Progress of Insight speeds up and cycles repeatedly. Eventually, 3rd and 4th Path are attained, resulting in what the Theravada Buddhists consider "full enlightenment." The kind of thumbnail sketch I've provided here makes this all sound fairly straightforward and perhaps even easy, but most people will not find it so. To reach the highest levels of enlightenment within this system requires a tremendous amount of concentration, which in turn requires great dedication and for most people many years of dedicated effort and considerable sacrifice. Nonetheless, it is possible and well worth doing; balancing concentration and insight brings about what I call "physio-energetic" development, a kind of human development that seems to be optional. In other words, the majority of people on Earth will not develop their potential in this arena and many will not even believe that such a possibility exists.
For more on the Progress of Insight and developmental enlightenment, click on the links (menu at top left) called "Progress of Insight" (parts 1-5) and the other links in this section.
Kenneth Folk
July 2009
|
|
|
The nature of insight
(page: 1 2)
|
25 |
Oct 18 2009, 7:00 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Aug 19 2009, 11:16 AM EDT
Watch
I was about to post this question under Chris' thread "The Most Powerful Insight" then thought it might be a different topic altogether.
My initial understanding was that insight is something that is attained directly by the subconscious. Once we verbalize the direct experience it doesn't become a direct experience anymore. Verbalization always entails abstraction and conceptualization, which we are trying to cut through in the first place.
Wisdom could result from such insights but it happens spontaneously in practical situations, but not deliberately derived from the insights we gain from our direct experience.
This has been my understanding and as a result I've always dismissed my own verbalized conclusions as thoughts and I've seen them as a threat to my direct insights. But now I see many experienced yogis talk about insights gained from their direct experience and I'm questioning my initial understanding.
Any thoughts?
Amr
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: The nature of insight
By: ,
Oct 18 2009, 7:00 PM EDT
For example, I think I made the necessary distinctions to carry me to the dark night during the retreat. I didn't have an "Ah" moment because I wasn't looking for something specific. Most likely the daily evening talks during the retreat and instruction helped in pointing out the distinctions I made during the meditation.
So yes, I think, it seems that we can progress all the way to equanimity and may be beyond, without having an "Ah" moment, but we need to make the necessary distinctions nevertheless.
Having someone pointing the distinctions out to us is important as it's possible to stare at something for a long time without seeing what is obvious.
This might also explain how we could have different, or even contradictory, maps that are based on the same experience. The experiences are like the Necker Cube, could be distinguished in different ways, exclusive in their interpretation but each of them is possible.
That's what I think... at least for now :)
Amr
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
NigelThompson |
|
Saints and Psychopaths
(page: 1 2)
|
28 |
Sep 16 2009, 7:29 PM EDT by
cmarti |
|
|
Thread started: Sep 13 2009, 11:59 PM EDT
Watch
I just had the good fortune to read this book last night that is recommended by Kenneth and Daniel.
The connection between you all is very clear. And, again, the book is extremely helpful.
2
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
Last Reply:
RE: Saints and Psychopaths [2 of 2]
By: cmarti,
Sep 16 2009, 7:29 PM EDT
"Frankly, that seems so obvious to me that I wonder why anyone disagrees. :-) "
Not me ;-)
I do agree with this, but for what I suspect are different reasons. Kenneth, you are far, far, far more experienced than I'll probably ever be so, of course, I bow to your judgment. My reasoning is that we are all human beings. There is nothing that happens along the Path that can possibly change that, so enlightened a little, a lot, or not at all, we collectively have the same chances of falling somewhere along the spectrum of human possibilities in regard to intellect, morality, and everything else that comes along with being human. We simply cannot, by definition, be outside that spectrum.
Now, we could talk about people who tend to get onto the Path and how they are, from a statistical POV, a self-seldecting sample - not random by any means. But that's for another topic on another day.
:-)
I've been away for a few days on business. It's nice to "see" you all here again.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page